Sep. 5th, 2008

sally_point_zero: (Default)
There should really be a mark for indicating to what extent, if any, an image has been altered,
eg
± denoting addition or deletion of elements within the image
§ enhanced pictorially
<> enhanced photographically
followed by a number indicating the degree.
The amount of manipulation that goes on is quite worrying. Its one thing to deal with virtual properties, another to sift the virtualPLUS from the undoctored.
If I'm posting photos, I often change the contrast or exposure settings, or simply hit 'enhance' which takes care of all that quickly (if using a smaller digi- camera). It seems pointless to mess with the actual subject as that will be seen in reality soon enough, plus it smacks of tampering with the evidence.
All the same, people do it not only with their own image, but, of far greater concern, with digital artwork images.



case in point

.
sally_point_zero: (Default)




Circuit demonstrates accepting a birthday present



.

Profile

sally_point_zero: (Default)
sally_point_zero

July 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 17th, 2025 10:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios